Positive results for: s-ob FMLP
Filter: All scenarios in which s-ob FMLP is the best, according to the pointwise metric.
In total, 16 configurations matched the filter.
| Configuration Nr. 364 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3784 |
| old sequence number | 191 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 376 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3515 |
| old sequence number | 193 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 387 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.3090 |
| old sequence number | 195 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 389 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3053 |
| old sequence number | 281 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 390 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.3053 |
| old sequence number | 238 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 392 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.3034 |
| old sequence number | 236 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 394 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 10 |
| interestingness score | 2.2914 |
| old sequence number | 192 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 399 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 1 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2729 |
| old sequence number | 194 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 412 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 7 |
| interestingness score | 2.2313 |
| old sequence number | 240 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 414 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.2266 |
| old sequence number | 239 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 421 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.2054 |
| old sequence number | 283 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 435 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 2.1684 |
| old sequence number | 326 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 436 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 8 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 2.1674 |
| old sequence number | 328 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 441 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 4 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 5 |
| interestingness score | 2.1517 |
| old sequence number | 284 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 531 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 4 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 1 |
| interestingness score | 1.9528 |
| old sequence number | 1001 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|
| Configuration Nr. 551 |
Classic vs. LP-Based Analysis |
Protocol Comparison (LP-Based Analysis) |
| m | 8 |
| utilization | exp-light |
| periods | log-uni-10-100 |
| #resources | 2 |
| access probability | 10% |
| CSL | short |
| #requests | 3 |
| interestingness score | 1.8899 |
| old sequence number | 958 |
| raw data (CSV) | |
|
|
|